Server Error while creating new account
When I tried to create an account, it showed a “red toast” saying → server error and nothing else. Same thing when I tried to log in, both before and after password reset.

Shaishav Vashi 6 months ago
Server Error while creating new account
When I tried to create an account, it showed a “red toast” saying → server error and nothing else. Same thing when I tried to log in, both before and after password reset.

Shaishav Vashi 6 months ago
Completed
2025 debates and items not displaying
The system currently fails to display or correctly process debates and associated items dated in 2025. This may stem from issues with data ingestion, date filtering, or categorization logic.

OpenPolicy 6 months ago
Completed
2025 debates and items not displaying
The system currently fails to display or correctly process debates and associated items dated in 2025. This may stem from issues with data ingestion, date filtering, or categorization logic.

OpenPolicy 6 months ago
UI/UX Issues
—Blurry icons across the platform —Spacing problems on bill summary displays —Intro screen centered text alignment issues —Consistency issues across mobile and web platforms —Accessibility problems on hover navigation

OpenPolicy 6 months ago
UI/UX Issues
—Blurry icons across the platform —Spacing problems on bill summary displays —Intro screen centered text alignment issues —Consistency issues across mobile and web platforms —Accessibility problems on hover navigation

OpenPolicy 6 months ago
Go through feature base
—A full audit is required to ensure the platform aligns with the original "feature base" —Cross-check existing features against the feature base —Identify missing, incomplete, or incorrectly implemented items —Prioritize updates and ensure roadmap alignment

OpenPolicy 6 months ago
Go through feature base
—A full audit is required to ensure the platform aligns with the original "feature base" —Cross-check existing features against the feature base —Identify missing, incomplete, or incorrectly implemented items —Prioritize updates and ensure roadmap alignment

OpenPolicy 6 months ago
Doesn't show all bills
— The platform is not displaying all available bills, possibly due to issues similar to the search-related bug. — Review the filtering, pagination, and rendering logic to ensure all bills in the database are surfaced correctly. — Verify that all daily update scripts are running as scheduled, without failures or skipped runs

OpenPolicy 6 months ago
Doesn't show all bills
— The platform is not displaying all available bills, possibly due to issues similar to the search-related bug. — Review the filtering, pagination, and rendering logic to ensure all bills in the database are surfaced correctly. — Verify that all daily update scripts are running as scheduled, without failures or skipped runs

OpenPolicy 6 months ago
Report generation missing from initial release
The platform lacks the ability to generate reports from collected data, which was planned for the initial release but was not implemented.

OpenPolicy 6 months ago
Report generation missing from initial release
The platform lacks the ability to generate reports from collected data, which was planned for the initial release but was not implemented.

OpenPolicy 6 months ago
Completed
Internal analytics (Admin)
Build a centralized dashboard within the admin panel to monitor website performance and user activity. This system should help administrators track usage trends, understand user behavior, and identify the most viewed or engaged-with content.

Ashish Tandon 6 months ago
Completed
Internal analytics (Admin)
Build a centralized dashboard within the admin panel to monitor website performance and user activity. This system should help administrators track usage trends, understand user behavior, and identify the most viewed or engaged-with content.

Ashish Tandon 6 months ago
Completed
Link to android app missing
Users on Android devices may struggle to find and download the mobile app. Accessibility to the Android app can significantly improve adoption, retention, and ease of use, especially for mobile-first users.

Ashish Tandon 6 months ago
Completed
Link to android app missing
Users on Android devices may struggle to find and download the mobile app. Accessibility to the Android app can significantly improve adoption, retention, and ease of use, especially for mobile-first users.

Ashish Tandon 6 months ago
Video Not updated on Website
—Video not on website —Website is still using a generic template —Update video content to reflect current platform features —Replace outdated promotional materials —Reference: http://OpenPolicy.me

Ashish Tandon 6 months ago
Video Not updated on Website
—Video not on website —Website is still using a generic template —Update video content to reflect current platform features —Replace outdated promotional materials —Reference: http://OpenPolicy.me

Ashish Tandon 6 months ago
French Language support missing
The platform currently does not support the French language, which limits accessibility for French-speaking users and affects the overall inclusivity of the platform. This absence can hinder user adoption in Francophone regions or among bilingual audiences.

Ashish Tandon 6 months ago
French Language support missing
The platform currently does not support the French language, which limits accessibility for French-speaking users and affects the overall inclusivity of the platform. This absence can hinder user adoption in Francophone regions or among bilingual audiences.

Ashish Tandon 6 months ago
AI should go through the entire bill not just the summary
The AI only processes bill summaries, which can result in incomplete or misleading outputs. This limits the accuracy of tagging, analysis, and user interactions.

Ashish Tandon 6 months ago
AI should go through the entire bill not just the summary
The AI only processes bill summaries, which can result in incomplete or misleading outputs. This limits the accuracy of tagging, analysis, and user interactions.

Ashish Tandon 6 months ago
Inaccurate Bill Dates
Dates shown on bills (e.g., introduction, readings, Royal Assent) are often incorrect or inconsistently formatted. This may be due to errors in data ingestion, time zone differences, or confusion between legislative sessions.

Ashish Tandon 6 months ago
Inaccurate Bill Dates
Dates shown on bills (e.g., introduction, readings, Royal Assent) are often incorrect or inconsistently formatted. This may be due to errors in data ingestion, time zone differences, or confusion between legislative sessions.

Ashish Tandon 6 months ago
Only shows 25 bills
: The platform currently limits the display of bills to a maximum of 25, regardless of how many bills are available in the database. This restriction is likely due to a hardcoded pagination setting, API query limit, or front-end display logic.

OpenPolicy 6 months ago
Only shows 25 bills
: The platform currently limits the display of bills to a maximum of 25, regardless of how many bills are available in the database. This restriction is likely due to a hardcoded pagination setting, API query limit, or front-end display logic.

OpenPolicy 6 months ago
Add “Self-Audit Toolkit” and Evidence Retention Features for Standards Compliance
Category: Governance & Trust Description: To support self-assessments and reviews aligned with DGSI or similar digital governance standards, we propose the addition of an Audit Toolkit feature within OpenPolicy.me. This feature should help institutional and civic tech users demonstrate integrity, transparency, and compliance through internal review mechanisms. Key Functionality: Audit Checklist Builder based on selected standards (e.g., AI ethics, cybersecurity, data governance) Evidence Uploads & Tagging for screenshots, documents, or in-app usage logs Evidence Storage with Timestamps to support audit trails Progress Tracker showing completion status against standards Downloadable Audit Summary Report for sharing with partners, funders, or councils Why this matters: A growing number of civic tech platforms like OpenPolicy.me are being evaluated against public trust and digital governance frameworks. This feature helps maintain readiness for formal audits, reviews, or certifications by capturing continuous evidence and encouraging best practices in ethical development and transparency. Linked Stakeholder Reference: Proposed in context of discussions with Digital Governance Council (Cherlene Tay – Senior Manager, Standardization) Links https://dgc-cgn.org/standards/#standards OpenPolicy.me should focus on the following key DGSI (Digital Governance Standards Institute) standards to build strong credibility and demonstrate alignment with trusted digital governance frameworks: ✅ 1. DGSI 100 – Data Governance and Accountability Why: Ensures responsible data handling, user consent, and transparency in how legislative data and user feedback are stored and processed. Key Areas: Data classification, retention, lifecycle management, data subject rights. ✅ 2. DGSI 200 – Cybersecurity Risk Management Why: Covers risk assessments, vulnerability management, and protection of platform integrity, essential for a public civic tech platform. Key Areas: Threat modeling, penetration testing, access control, system monitoring. ✅ 3. DGSI 301 – Algorithmic Transparency and Fairness in AI Why: Critical if OpenPolicy.me is using NLP/AI to summarize bills or conduct sentiment analysis. Ensures decisions are explainable and non-discriminatory. Key Areas: Bias audits, traceability, explainability, model governance. ✅ 4. DGSI 400 – Digital Trust and Citizen Experience Why: Focuses on inclusive design, accessibility, and transparency—key pillars of OpenPolicy’s public engagement strategy. Key Areas: UX equity, multi-language support, accessibility standards (WCAG), and disclosure protocols. ✅ 5. DGSI 501 – Ethics and Responsible Use of Emerging Tech Why: Supports positioning the platform as a values-driven civic tool. Applies to use of AI, predictive analytics, or participatory decision-making. Key Areas: Ethical review boards, audit logging for AI decisions, community oversight. Aligning with even 2–3 of these standards through a self-assessment and publishing a public statement of conformance can dramatically elevate OpenPolicy’s perceived legitimacy.

OpenPolicy 7 months ago
Add “Self-Audit Toolkit” and Evidence Retention Features for Standards Compliance
Category: Governance & Trust Description: To support self-assessments and reviews aligned with DGSI or similar digital governance standards, we propose the addition of an Audit Toolkit feature within OpenPolicy.me. This feature should help institutional and civic tech users demonstrate integrity, transparency, and compliance through internal review mechanisms. Key Functionality: Audit Checklist Builder based on selected standards (e.g., AI ethics, cybersecurity, data governance) Evidence Uploads & Tagging for screenshots, documents, or in-app usage logs Evidence Storage with Timestamps to support audit trails Progress Tracker showing completion status against standards Downloadable Audit Summary Report for sharing with partners, funders, or councils Why this matters: A growing number of civic tech platforms like OpenPolicy.me are being evaluated against public trust and digital governance frameworks. This feature helps maintain readiness for formal audits, reviews, or certifications by capturing continuous evidence and encouraging best practices in ethical development and transparency. Linked Stakeholder Reference: Proposed in context of discussions with Digital Governance Council (Cherlene Tay – Senior Manager, Standardization) Links https://dgc-cgn.org/standards/#standards OpenPolicy.me should focus on the following key DGSI (Digital Governance Standards Institute) standards to build strong credibility and demonstrate alignment with trusted digital governance frameworks: ✅ 1. DGSI 100 – Data Governance and Accountability Why: Ensures responsible data handling, user consent, and transparency in how legislative data and user feedback are stored and processed. Key Areas: Data classification, retention, lifecycle management, data subject rights. ✅ 2. DGSI 200 – Cybersecurity Risk Management Why: Covers risk assessments, vulnerability management, and protection of platform integrity, essential for a public civic tech platform. Key Areas: Threat modeling, penetration testing, access control, system monitoring. ✅ 3. DGSI 301 – Algorithmic Transparency and Fairness in AI Why: Critical if OpenPolicy.me is using NLP/AI to summarize bills or conduct sentiment analysis. Ensures decisions are explainable and non-discriminatory. Key Areas: Bias audits, traceability, explainability, model governance. ✅ 4. DGSI 400 – Digital Trust and Citizen Experience Why: Focuses on inclusive design, accessibility, and transparency—key pillars of OpenPolicy’s public engagement strategy. Key Areas: UX equity, multi-language support, accessibility standards (WCAG), and disclosure protocols. ✅ 5. DGSI 501 – Ethics and Responsible Use of Emerging Tech Why: Supports positioning the platform as a values-driven civic tool. Applies to use of AI, predictive analytics, or participatory decision-making. Key Areas: Ethical review boards, audit logging for AI decisions, community oversight. Aligning with even 2–3 of these standards through a self-assessment and publishing a public statement of conformance can dramatically elevate OpenPolicy’s perceived legitimacy.

OpenPolicy 7 months ago
Completed
Google PlayStore Production
Run your closed test with at least 12 testers for 14 more days starting from the review date https://support.google.com/googleplay/android-developer/answer/14151465 App testing requirements for new personal developer accounts In November 2023, we changed the requirements for publishing new apps on Google Play to help developers to test their app, identify issues, get feedback and ensure that everything is ready before they launch. These changes require developers with personal accounts created after 13 November 2023 to meet specific testing requirements before they can make their app available on Google Play. This article provides an overview of the new requirements, a summary of the different testing tracks in Play Console and the steps that developers with personal accounts will need to take to make their apps available to users on Google Play. Introducing testing requirements for newly created personal accounts Testing is an integral part of the app development process. By running tests against your app consistently, you can verify your app's correctness, functional behaviour and usability before you release it publicly. This minimises the impact of any technical or user experience issues and helps you to release the best version of your app. Developers that regularly use Play Console's testing tools prior to publishing their apps are able to provide higher quality experiences that can lead to higher ratings and more success on Google Play. To help all developers to deliver high-quality apps, we're introducing new testing requirements. Developers with personal accounts created after 13 November 2023 will need to test their apps before those apps are eligible to be published for distribution on Google Play. Certain features in Play Console, such as Production (Test and release Production) and Pre-registration (Test and release Testing Pre-registration), will be disabled until developers meet these requirements. Overview of testing requirements If you have a newly created personal developer account, you must run a closed test for your app with a minimum of 12 testers who have been opted in for at least the last 14 days continuously. When you meet these criteria, you can apply for production access on the Dashboard in Play Console so that you can ultimately distribute your app on Google Play. When you apply, you must answer some questions to help us understand your app, its testing process and its production readiness. You can read about the different types of testing tracks and requirements for each in more detail below, and find more details about applying for production access. Understanding different testing tracks and their requirements Play Console provides different types of testing tracks so that you can gradually ramp up testing and improve your app to the point that it's ready to reach billions of users on Google Play. Internal testing: Before you've finished setting up your app, you can quickly distribute builds to a small group of your own trusted testers. This can help you to identify issues and get early feedback. Builds are normally available to testers within seconds of being added in Play Console. Internal testing is optional, but we recommend that you start here. Closed testing: With closed testing, you can share your app with a wide group of users that you control. This allows you to fix issues and ensure that your app complies with Google Play policy before you launch. You must run a closed test before you can apply to publish your app to production. At least 12 testers must be opted in to your closed test when you apply for production access. They must have been opted in for the last 14 days continuously. You can start a closed test once you're finished setting up your app. Open testing: Allows you to surface your app's test version on Google Play. If you run an open test, anyone can join your testing programme and submit private feedback to you. Before choosing this option, make sure that your app and store listing is ready to be visible on Google Play. Open testing is available when you have production access. Production: Where you make your app available to billions of users on Google Play. Before you can apply to publish your app to production, you need to run a closed test which meets our criteria. When you apply, you'll also need to answer some questions about your closed test. When you apply for production access, at least 12 testers must be opted in to your closed test. They must have been opted in for the last 14 days continuously. Summary of testing requirements per track Guidance and best practices for closed testing You can learn how to design, develop and distribute your Android apps on Google through the helpful links below: Recruiting testers The most common way to recruit testers is to use personal and professional networks. You can reach out to your friends, family, colleagues or classmates, for example, and ask them to be beta testers for your app. You can reach out to communities where users are likely to exist and actively recruit them to test your app. For example, if you're building an app for CrossFit enthusiasts, then consider approaching a local club or connecting with your target users in online groups. You can also post about your app on social media and ask your followers to sign up for testing. If possible, you should recruit a diverse group of testers to identify bugs and usability issues that may be specific to certain types of users or devices. For the same reason, you should also recruit testers who you believe to be representative of your app's future users. For example, if you're developing a productivity app for businesses, you should recruit testers who are business professionals from different industries in which you believe your app may be popular. The closer your test users are to your target users, the more useful feedback you'll receive. Engaging with testers Once you have recruited a group of beta testers, it's important to provide them with clear instructions on how to test your app and report bugs. Let your testers know what type of feedback you are looking for. Try to encourage testers to use as many of your app's features as possible in order to receive holistic feedback. Include a feedback channel or let your users know how they can provide you with feedback (for example, by email, website or message forum). Your testers can also provide you with private feedback through Google Play. Important: Emphasise to your testers that they need to remain opted in to your closed test for at least 14 days continuously. Gathering and viewing user feedback If you have an app in testing, you can access and reply to user feedback in Play Console. Feedback from users is only visible to you and can't be seen on Google Play. Open Play Console and go to the Testing feedback page (Ratings and reviews Testing feedback). Decide how you want to browse your feedback. Filter: To see beta feedback based on certain criteria (such as date, language, reply state, app version, device and more), select from the available filters. Search: To look for specific words in your feedback, use the search box. Tip: Keep a record of feedback you receive. Rereading this later may make it easier for you to identify common feedback themes or issues that you want to address in the short or long term to improve your app. We'll also ask you to summarise your testing feedback for us later when you apply for production access. Acting on user feedback Throughout your app's testing period, you should be responsive to your testers' feedback and make sure to fix any bugs that they find. This will: Help to improve your app's user experience; increase the likelihood of a successful application for production access; and make it more likely to avoid negative reviews when you begin to distribute your app on Google Play. Advanced testing The guidance in this article is just a starting point to help you understand testing basics as you prepare to distribute your first app. You can explore far more advanced testing resources and techniques to optimise your app's quality as you become more experienced as a developer. For example, you may want to learn about testing apps on Android and the fundamentals of testing on the Android Developers site. Play Console also provides a range of features that can help you identify issues with your app. You can set up and run a pre-launch report to proactively identify issues before your app reaches users via a detailed report listing issues, warnings and errors that you may want to investigate and resolve. Running closed tests You can learn how to set up and run a closed test using this Help Centre page. Apply for access to production Once you've met the closed testing requirements, you can apply for production access. To begin: Go to the Dashboard. Click Apply for production. You must then answer the following questions about your closed test, your app and its production readiness. These questions are divided into three sections: About your closed test About your app/game Production readiness You can find guidance for providing information for each section by expanding the sections below. Part 1: Tell us about your closed test Part 2: Tell us about your app/game Part 3: Tell us about your production readiness After you apply for access to production After you've completed your request for access to production, we'll review your submission When the review is complete, we'll email the account owner with an update. This usually takes seven days or less, but may occasionally take longer. If your app isn't ready to be published, you may be required to continue testing your app. Examples include not having 12 testers opted in to your closed test or your testers not being engaged with your app during your closed test. If your application is successful, you can access Production (Test and release Production) and can make your app available to billions of users on Google Play when you think that it's ready. You can also use Open testing (Test and release Testing Open testing). We recommend testing your app extensively before publishing it to production and routinely testing any future updates that you make.S

OpenPolicy 7 months ago
Completed
Google PlayStore Production
Run your closed test with at least 12 testers for 14 more days starting from the review date https://support.google.com/googleplay/android-developer/answer/14151465 App testing requirements for new personal developer accounts In November 2023, we changed the requirements for publishing new apps on Google Play to help developers to test their app, identify issues, get feedback and ensure that everything is ready before they launch. These changes require developers with personal accounts created after 13 November 2023 to meet specific testing requirements before they can make their app available on Google Play. This article provides an overview of the new requirements, a summary of the different testing tracks in Play Console and the steps that developers with personal accounts will need to take to make their apps available to users on Google Play. Introducing testing requirements for newly created personal accounts Testing is an integral part of the app development process. By running tests against your app consistently, you can verify your app's correctness, functional behaviour and usability before you release it publicly. This minimises the impact of any technical or user experience issues and helps you to release the best version of your app. Developers that regularly use Play Console's testing tools prior to publishing their apps are able to provide higher quality experiences that can lead to higher ratings and more success on Google Play. To help all developers to deliver high-quality apps, we're introducing new testing requirements. Developers with personal accounts created after 13 November 2023 will need to test their apps before those apps are eligible to be published for distribution on Google Play. Certain features in Play Console, such as Production (Test and release Production) and Pre-registration (Test and release Testing Pre-registration), will be disabled until developers meet these requirements. Overview of testing requirements If you have a newly created personal developer account, you must run a closed test for your app with a minimum of 12 testers who have been opted in for at least the last 14 days continuously. When you meet these criteria, you can apply for production access on the Dashboard in Play Console so that you can ultimately distribute your app on Google Play. When you apply, you must answer some questions to help us understand your app, its testing process and its production readiness. You can read about the different types of testing tracks and requirements for each in more detail below, and find more details about applying for production access. Understanding different testing tracks and their requirements Play Console provides different types of testing tracks so that you can gradually ramp up testing and improve your app to the point that it's ready to reach billions of users on Google Play. Internal testing: Before you've finished setting up your app, you can quickly distribute builds to a small group of your own trusted testers. This can help you to identify issues and get early feedback. Builds are normally available to testers within seconds of being added in Play Console. Internal testing is optional, but we recommend that you start here. Closed testing: With closed testing, you can share your app with a wide group of users that you control. This allows you to fix issues and ensure that your app complies with Google Play policy before you launch. You must run a closed test before you can apply to publish your app to production. At least 12 testers must be opted in to your closed test when you apply for production access. They must have been opted in for the last 14 days continuously. You can start a closed test once you're finished setting up your app. Open testing: Allows you to surface your app's test version on Google Play. If you run an open test, anyone can join your testing programme and submit private feedback to you. Before choosing this option, make sure that your app and store listing is ready to be visible on Google Play. Open testing is available when you have production access. Production: Where you make your app available to billions of users on Google Play. Before you can apply to publish your app to production, you need to run a closed test which meets our criteria. When you apply, you'll also need to answer some questions about your closed test. When you apply for production access, at least 12 testers must be opted in to your closed test. They must have been opted in for the last 14 days continuously. Summary of testing requirements per track Guidance and best practices for closed testing You can learn how to design, develop and distribute your Android apps on Google through the helpful links below: Recruiting testers The most common way to recruit testers is to use personal and professional networks. You can reach out to your friends, family, colleagues or classmates, for example, and ask them to be beta testers for your app. You can reach out to communities where users are likely to exist and actively recruit them to test your app. For example, if you're building an app for CrossFit enthusiasts, then consider approaching a local club or connecting with your target users in online groups. You can also post about your app on social media and ask your followers to sign up for testing. If possible, you should recruit a diverse group of testers to identify bugs and usability issues that may be specific to certain types of users or devices. For the same reason, you should also recruit testers who you believe to be representative of your app's future users. For example, if you're developing a productivity app for businesses, you should recruit testers who are business professionals from different industries in which you believe your app may be popular. The closer your test users are to your target users, the more useful feedback you'll receive. Engaging with testers Once you have recruited a group of beta testers, it's important to provide them with clear instructions on how to test your app and report bugs. Let your testers know what type of feedback you are looking for. Try to encourage testers to use as many of your app's features as possible in order to receive holistic feedback. Include a feedback channel or let your users know how they can provide you with feedback (for example, by email, website or message forum). Your testers can also provide you with private feedback through Google Play. Important: Emphasise to your testers that they need to remain opted in to your closed test for at least 14 days continuously. Gathering and viewing user feedback If you have an app in testing, you can access and reply to user feedback in Play Console. Feedback from users is only visible to you and can't be seen on Google Play. Open Play Console and go to the Testing feedback page (Ratings and reviews Testing feedback). Decide how you want to browse your feedback. Filter: To see beta feedback based on certain criteria (such as date, language, reply state, app version, device and more), select from the available filters. Search: To look for specific words in your feedback, use the search box. Tip: Keep a record of feedback you receive. Rereading this later may make it easier for you to identify common feedback themes or issues that you want to address in the short or long term to improve your app. We'll also ask you to summarise your testing feedback for us later when you apply for production access. Acting on user feedback Throughout your app's testing period, you should be responsive to your testers' feedback and make sure to fix any bugs that they find. This will: Help to improve your app's user experience; increase the likelihood of a successful application for production access; and make it more likely to avoid negative reviews when you begin to distribute your app on Google Play. Advanced testing The guidance in this article is just a starting point to help you understand testing basics as you prepare to distribute your first app. You can explore far more advanced testing resources and techniques to optimise your app's quality as you become more experienced as a developer. For example, you may want to learn about testing apps on Android and the fundamentals of testing on the Android Developers site. Play Console also provides a range of features that can help you identify issues with your app. You can set up and run a pre-launch report to proactively identify issues before your app reaches users via a detailed report listing issues, warnings and errors that you may want to investigate and resolve. Running closed tests You can learn how to set up and run a closed test using this Help Centre page. Apply for access to production Once you've met the closed testing requirements, you can apply for production access. To begin: Go to the Dashboard. Click Apply for production. You must then answer the following questions about your closed test, your app and its production readiness. These questions are divided into three sections: About your closed test About your app/game Production readiness You can find guidance for providing information for each section by expanding the sections below. Part 1: Tell us about your closed test Part 2: Tell us about your app/game Part 3: Tell us about your production readiness After you apply for access to production After you've completed your request for access to production, we'll review your submission When the review is complete, we'll email the account owner with an update. This usually takes seven days or less, but may occasionally take longer. If your app isn't ready to be published, you may be required to continue testing your app. Examples include not having 12 testers opted in to your closed test or your testers not being engaged with your app during your closed test. If your application is successful, you can access Production (Test and release Production) and can make your app available to billions of users on Google Play when you think that it's ready. You can also use Open testing (Test and release Testing Open testing). We recommend testing your app extensively before publishing it to production and routinely testing any future updates that you make.S

OpenPolicy 7 months ago
Completed
Incorrect or Outdated Bill Associations
Title: Old bills shown under current identifiers (e.g., current C-2 showing COVID relief bill) Description: The current Bill C-2 is related to border security, but the app displays an outdated version. Possibly a session mismatch or outdated data source. Impact: High risk of misinformation. Category: Data Source Issue / Accuracy

OpenPolicy 7 months ago
Completed
Incorrect or Outdated Bill Associations
Title: Old bills shown under current identifiers (e.g., current C-2 showing COVID relief bill) Description: The current Bill C-2 is related to border security, but the app displays an outdated version. Possibly a session mismatch or outdated data source. Impact: High risk of misinformation. Category: Data Source Issue / Accuracy

OpenPolicy 7 months ago